Alert!

This website is for informational purposes only. Nothing contained herein is offered as legal advice, and nothing on this website establishes any type of attorney-client relationship with any visitor to this site. An attorney-client relationship can only be established with the assent of Wilkes Atkinson & Joyner, LLC, and with the execution of a written agreement establishing the scope of that relationship.

WAJ Prevails on MCS-90 Issue in Coverage Appeal

WAJ Prevails on MCS-90 Issue in Coverage Appeal

August 10th 2026

In 2025, WAJ Attorney Dan Atkinson obtained summary judgment for an insurer seeking a finding of no coverage for a wrongful death claim, where the insurer received no notice of the wrongful death lawsuit prior entry of a multimillion-dollar default judgment against an insured driver.  The Decedent's Estate appealed, in part arguing that, despite any defenses to coverage the insurer may have possessed, an MCS-90 endorsement, required for certain interstate trucking entities, required satisfaction of a portion of the judgment.

Attorney Atkinson successfully litigated the appeal, arguing that MCS-90 endorsements provide protection to named insureds only, and that the named insured was not a party to the action, nor was it a judgment debtor in the case.  In a reported decision, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of summary judgment, ruling in part that MCS-90 endorsements provide coverage to named insureds only, and that the insurer owed no duties of indemnity for the multimillion-dollar judgment. The case is Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Owens, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24071, ___ F.4th ___ (4th Cir. 2026).

Error Message